New Study of GHG Emissions from Natural Gas-Powered Light Duty Vehicles Contributes to Understanding, Demonstrates Difficulty of Assessing with Real World Certainty

Fuels Institute Press Release | October 8, 2015

ALEXANDRIA, VA – A recently published analysis by Carnegie Mellon University, evaluating the potential life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from using natural gas to power light-duty vehicles, demonstrates the “uncertainty and variability” of such assessments. The study contributes to the library of studies conducting life cycle analysis of GHG emissions from using natural gas in the transportation sector through multiple pathways.

“The analysis of life cycle GHG emissions from transportation is a very complicated process and is subject to intense scrutiny by vested stakeholders,” acknowledged John Eichberger, executive director of the Fuels Institute. “Determining what sources to leverage for certain values and which assumptions to use when developing a model are critical ingredients that affect the ultimate outcome. Carnegie Mellon researchers have done a fantastic job developing an analysis that contributes directly to the scientific body of work evaluating the long-term effects of using natural gas to fuel our transportation sector. We are proud to have been a part of this work and hope it elevates the discussion on the topic and leads to broader understanding of the potential viability of natural gas-based fuels.”

The researchers evaluated the use of natural gas used in transportation as compressed natural gas (CNG) and as a feedstock to produce electricity, hydrogen, liquid fuels (via the Fischer-Tropsch method), methanol and ethanol. These fuels were then modeled for use in spark-ignited internal combustion engines, compression-ignited engines, flex fuel vehicles, hybrid, plug-in and battery-electric vehicles and fuel cell vehicles. The analysis evaluated the life cycle emissions for each pathway, including vehicle manufacturing and fugitive emissions of natural gas. In addition, the researchers evaluated the global warming potential of natural gas-powered light duty vehicles over a period of both 20 years and 100 years.

In general, the study found that the greatest GHG emissions benefit is derived from battery electric vehicles charged with electricity solely from advanced combined cycle natural gas powered generating facilities. Hydrogen fuel cell and CNG vehicles were found to have comparable life cycle emissions with conventional gasoline. Other pathways found emissions increased compared with conventional gasoline.

But the researchers acknowledged that the uncertainty and variability in life cycle GHG emissions of natural gas pathways must be taken into consideration when contemplating the implications of such studies and, in particular, when policymakers are setting emissions-based policy goals. For this evaluation, the authors used a mean average.

“An accurate evaluation of the environmental effects of any fuel, including natural gas, requires a comprehensive assessment,” Eichberger cautioned. “This paper by Carnegie Mellon is a valuable addition to the information available and will help advance our efforts to understand the role natural gas may play in the transportation sector.”

The low-cost and abundant supply of shale gas in the United States has increased the interest in using natural gas for transportation. The paper, “Comparison of Life Cycle Greenhouse Gases from Natural Gas Pathways for Light-Duty Vehicles,” is the second in a series of studies sponsored by the Fuels Institute and NATSO Foundation evaluating the use of natural gas as a transportation fuel.

As the authors mention in the conclusion of this study, additional work in this series will look at the potential for natural-gas based fuels to reduce other air pollutants and what effect such fuels might have on consumers, specifically related to cost, performance, convenience and safety. Carnegie Mellon is also evaluating the feasibility of developing an infrastructure system to support a natural gas transportation economy.

Each publication prepared by Carnegie Mellon University within the series is intended to be published in a peer reviewed scientific journal and will contribute directly to the overall understanding of the developing natural gas market.

This report and all papers produced by Carnegie Mellon University in this natural gas series will be publically available through the appropriate journals. The Fuels Institute will provide links to each paper as it is available and will present the series as a collection on the Fuels Institute website at The initial report was recently was published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology and can be accessed free of charge at

Additional perspectives on this topic submitted by members of the Fuels Institute Board of Advisors are available at In addition, you can join the conversation on this and other research projects sponsored and/or published by the Fuels Institute at the organization’s page on LinkedIn.


The Fuels Institute, founded by NACS in 2013, is a non-profit research-oriented think tank dedicated to evaluating market issues related to vehicles and the fuels that power them. Led by a Board of Directors and driven by a Board of Advisors, the Fuels Institute incorporates the perspective of interested stakeholders affected by this market, including fuel retailers, fuel producers and refiners, alternative and renewable fuel producers, automobile manufacturers, environmental advocates, consumer organizations, academics, government entities and other stakeholders with expertise in the fuels and automotive industries.

Founded in 1961 as the National Association of Convenience Stores, NACS is the international association for convenience and fuel retailing. The U.S. convenience store industry, with more than 151,000 stores across the country, posted $696 billion in total sales in 2013, of which $491 billion were motor fuels sales. NACS has 2,100 retail and 1,600 supplier member companies, which do business in nearly 50 countries.